minicros.blogg.se - Compare graphics cards geforce gtx 770 vs geforce gtx 780

#Compare graphics cards geforce gtx 770 vs geforce gtx 780 series#

Power supply: Corsair AX1200i 1200 W (with a default 120 mm fan).

Control and monitoring panel: Zalman ZM-MFC3.

System case: Antec Twelve Hundred (front panel: three Noiseblocker NB-Multiframe S-Series MF12-S2 fans at 1020 RPM back panel: two Noiseblocker NB-BlackSilentPRO PL-1 fans at 1020 RPM top panel:.

Backup drive: Samsung Ecogreen F4 HD204UI (SATA-II, 2 TB, 5400 RPM, 32 MB, NCQ).

Drive for programs and games: Western Digital VelociRaptor (300GB, SATA-II, 10000 RPM, 16MB cache, NCQ) inside Scythe Quiet Drive 3.5” HDD silencer and cooler.

System drive: Crucial m4 256 GB SSD (SATA-III,CT256M4SSD2, BIOS v0009).

HIS Radeon HD 7970 IceQ X² GHz Edition 3 GB 1050/6000 MHz.

CPU cooler: Phanteks PH-TC14PE (2 x Corsair AF140 fans at 900 RPM).

Mainboard: Intel Siler DX79SI (Intel X79 Express, LGA 2011, BIOS 0559 from ).

So, it’s the GeForce GTX 770 graphics card that we’re going to talk about in this review.Īll participating graphics cards were tested in a system with the following configuration: $499), the GeForce GTX 770 seems to be a more attractive option than the GeForce GTX 680. Coupled with the $50 lower recommended price ($399 vs. Moreover, the latter has the same configuration as the GeForce GTX 680’s GPU but works at higher clock rates and with 17% faster GDDR5 memory. Although its model names begins with a “7”, the GeForce GTX 770 is based on the 28nm GK104 processor of the Kepler series.

#Compare graphics cards geforce gtx 770 vs geforce gtx 780 series#

However, the GeForce GTX 780 release has overshadowed the announcement of what seems to be the most interesting 7 series card at the moment. Nvidia’s message to gamers is clear enough: pay more if you want more speed.

Based on the same GK110 processor, the recently released GeForce GTX 780 adds 30% to the speed of Nvidia’s single-GPU flagship of the previous generation but has a rather high price, too. As you may know, it comes at a recommended $999. This may be a case of GTX 770 squeezing out a bit more performance due to GPU Boost 2.0.The Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan graphics card has provoked a sensation not only in terms of its unprecedented performance (for a single-GPU device) but also in terms of its price.

GTX 770 pulls ahead in TessMark by more than we would expect given the fact that this test should be largely GPU limited. Texel throughput on the other hand is all about the core clocks the improvement over the GTX 680 is barely at 3%, and GTX 770 is well behind GTX 780.įinally we’ll take a quick look at tessellation performance with TessMark. Moving on, we have our 3DMark Vantage texture fillrate test, which does for texels and texture mapping units what the previous test does for ROPs. In real games GTX 780 is still going to have the edge, but in edge cases having such a clockspeed gap can lead to some unusual outcomes. This is a bit paradoxical at first, but it’s worth keeping in mind that this is a pixel throughput test, and GTX 770’s ROPs are clocked a good 200MHz+ higher than GTX 780’s. Thanks to the combination of core clock and memory clock increases, GTX 770 doesn’t just pass GTX 680, but even GTX 780. We’ll start with 3DMark Vantage’s Pixel Fill test. These tests are mostly for comparing cards from within a manufacturer, as opposed to directly comparing AMD and NVIDIA cards. As always we’ll also take a quick look at synthetic performance, though as GTX 780 is just another GK110 card, there shouldn't be any surprises here.